微型异养鞭毛虫摄食选择性的研究进展

黄凌风; 林施泉; 熊源; 陆家昌; 吴林南

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253 4193.2013.02.001

微型异养鞭毛虫摄食选择性的研究进展

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253 4193.2013.02.001

1.
厦门大学海洋与环境学院, 福建厦门, 361005;福建省海陆界面生态环境重点实验室, 福建厦门, 361005
2.
厦门大学海洋与环境学院, 福建厦门, 361005

基金项目: 国家973计划项目课题(No.2011CB409804);国家自然科学基金项目(No.40876078)。

计量
- 文章访问数: 1812
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 1648
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-05-31
- 修回日期: 2012-12-20

Progress in the study of the selective feeding of heterotrophic nanoflagellate

1.
College of Oceanography and Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China;Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Coastal Ecology and Environmental Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
2.
College of Oceanography and Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China

摘要

摘要: 微型异养鞭毛虫(HNF)是海洋微微型浮游生物的重要摄食者,通过摄食作用对后者的种类(或类群)组成、粒径分布、数量结构和营养价值等属性具有重要的影响,而这与HNF的摄食选择性有直接关系。对HNF摄食选择性的研究有助于深入了解HNF在海洋微食物环乃至整个海洋生态系统中的作用。就国际上已开展的HNF摄食选择性相关研究进行了回顾,分析和总结了影响HNF选择性摄食的关键因素,如食物大小、游动性、营养价值及食物细胞表面的生化结构特征等,并重点介绍了HNF摄食选择性形成的主要机制以及HNF的选择性摄食在调节海洋微微型浮游生物群落结构中的作用。
- 微型异养鞭毛虫 /
- 微微型浮游生物 /
- 异养细菌 /
- 摄食选择性
Abstract: Heterotrophic nanoflagellate (abbr., HNF) is the principal consumer of picoplankton in marine ecosystem. Recognizing its selective feeding impact is essential to evaluate the role of HNF in the marine microbial food web. Over the last few decades, there has been a concerted effort by many researchers to the understanding of selective grazing behaviors among HNF. This paper,(1) summarize current knowledge on factors affecting HNF selective feeding; (2) discuss mechanisms involved in HNF selective feeding; (3) review the influence of HNF selective feeding on the shape, size structure, taxonomic composition and physiological status of picoplankton communities.
- heterotrophic nanoflagellate /
- picoplankton /
- heterotrophic bacteria /
- selective feeding

HTML全文

参考文献(69)

黄凌风, 郭丰. 微食物环及其在能流,物流过程中的作用[M]//唐启升, 苏纪兰. 中国海洋生态系统动力学研究:关键科学问题与研究发展战略. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000: 212—217.

黄凌风, 潘科, 郭丰, 等. 异养性海洋鞭毛虫摄食生态学研究进展[J]. 海洋科学, 2006, 30(4): 78—82.

Montagnes D J S, Barbosa A B, Boenigk J, et al. Selective feeding behaviour of key free-living protists: avenues for continued study[J]. Aquat Microb Ecol, 2008, 53(1): 83—98.

Christaki U, Vázquez-Domínguez E, Courties C, et al. Grazing impact of different heterotrophic nanoflagellates on eukaryotic (Ostreococcus tauri) and prokaryotic picoautotrophs (Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus)[J]. Environ Microbiol, 2005, 7(8): 1200—1210.

Zwirglmaier K, Spence E, Zubkov M V, et al. Differential grazing of two heterotrophic nanoflagellates on marine Synechococcus strains[J]. Environ Microbiol, 2009, 11(7): 1767—1776.

Sherr E B, Sherr B F. Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs[J]. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2002, 81: 293—308.

Martín-Cereceda M, Williams R A J, Novarino G. Easy visualization of the protist Oxyrrhis marina grazing on a live fluorescently labelled heterotrophic nanoflagellate[J]. Curr Microbiol, 2008, 57(1): 45—50.

Sleigh M A. Trophic strategies[M]//Leadbeater B S C, Green J C. The Flagellates: Unity, Diversity and Evolution. London: Taylor & Francis, 2000: 147—165.

Marchant H J, Scott F J. Uptake of sub-micrometre particles and dissolved organic material by Antarctic choanoflagellates[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1993, 92: 59—59.

Boenigk J, Arndt H. Bacterivory by heterotrophic flagellates: community structure and feeding strategies[J]. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2002, 81: 465—480.

Fenchel T. Flagellate design and function[M]//Patterson D J, Larsen J. Ecology of Protozoa: The Biology of Free-living Phagotrophic Protists. Madison: Science Tech Publishers, 1987: 7—19.

Hansen B W, Bjrnsen P K, Hansen P J. The size ratio between planktonic predators and their prey[J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 1994, 39(2): 395—403.

Andersson A, Larsson U, Hagstr M Å. Size-selective grazing by a microflagellate on pelagic bacteria[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1986, 33: 51—57.

Holen D A, Boraas M E. The feeding behavior of Spumella sp. as a function of particle size: implications for bacterial size in pelagic systems[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1991, 220(1): 73—88.

Monger B C, Landry M R. Prey-size dependency of grazing by free-living marine flagellates[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1991, 74: 239—248.

Epstein S S, Shiaris M P. Size-selective grazing of coastal bacterioplankton by natural assemblages of pigmented flagellates, colorless flagellates, and ciliates[J]. Microb Ecol, 1992, 23(3): 211—225.

González J M. Efficient size-selective bacterivory by phagotrophic nanoflagellates in aquatic ecosystems[J]. Mar Biol, 1996, 126(4): 785—789.

Hahn M W, Höfle M G. Grazing of protozoa and its effect on populations of aquatic bacteria[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2001, 35(2): 113—121.

Pernthaler J, Sattler B, Šimek K, et al. Top-down effects on the size-biomass distribution of a freshwater bacterioplankton community[J]. Aquat Microb Ecol, 1996, 10(3): 255—263.

Fenchel T. Eppur si muove: many water column bacteria are motile[J]. Aquat Microb Ecol, 2001, 24(2): 197—201.

Mitchell J G, Pearson L, Dillon S, et al. Natural assemblages of marine bacteria exhibiting high-speed motility and large accelerations[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995, 61(12): 4436—4440.

Monger B C, Landry M R. Size-selective grazing by heterotrophic nanoflagellates: an analysis using live-stained bacteria and dual-beam flow cytometry[J]. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol, 1992, 37: 173—185.

González J M, Sherr E B, Sherr B F. Differential feeding by marine flagellates on growing versus starving, and on motile versus nonmotile, bacterial prey[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1993, 102: 257—267.

Matz C, Boenigk J, Arndt H, et al. Role of bacterial phenotypic traits in selective feeding of the heterotrophic nanoflagellate Spumella sp. [J]. Aquat Microb Ecol, 2002, 27(2): 137—148.

Matz C, Jürgens K. High motility reduces grazing mortality of planktonic bacteria[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2005, 71(2): 921—929.

Jürgens K, Matz C. Predation as a shaping force for the phenotypic and genotypic composition of planktonic bacteria[J]. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2002, 81: 413—434.

Boenigk J, Matz C, Jürgens K, et al. The influence of preculture conditions and food quality on the ingestion and digestion process of three species of heterotrophic nanoflagellates[J]. Microb Ecol, 2001, 42(2): 168—176.

Davidson K, Roberts E C, Wilson A M, et al. The role of prey nutritional status in governing protozoan nitrogen regeneration efficiency[J]. Protist, 2005, 156(1): 45-62.

Vázquez-Domínguez E, Casamayor E O, Catal P, et al. Different marine heterotrophic nanoflagellates affect differentially the composition of enriched bacterial communities[J]. Microb Ecol, 2005, 49(3): 474—485.

Shannon S P, Chrzanowski T H, Grover J P. Prey food quality affects flagellate ingestion rates[J]. Microb Ecol, 2007, 53(1): 66—73.

Sterner R W. Daphnia growth on varying quality of Scenedesmus: mineral limitation of zooplankton[J]. Ecology, 1993, 74(8): 2351—2360.

Jürgens K, Demott W R. Behavioral flexibility in prey selection by bacterivorous nanoflagellates[J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 1995, 40(8): 1503—1507.

John E H, Davidson K. Prey selectivity and the influence of prey carbon:nitrogen ratio on microflagellate grazing[J]. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 2001, 260(1): 93—111.

Sibbald M J, Albright L J, Sibbald P R. Chemosensory responses of a heterotrophic microflagellate to bacteria and several nitrogen compounds[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1987, 36: 201—204.

Ederington M C, Mcmanus G B, Harvey H R. Trophic transfer of fatty acids, sterols, and a triterpenoid alcohol between bacteria, a ciliate, and the copepod Acartia tonsa[J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 1995, 40(5): 860—867.

Wolfe G V. The chemical defense ecology of marine unicellular plankton: constraints, mechanisms, and impacts[J]. Biol Bull, 2000, 198(2): 225-244.

Flynn K J, Davidson K, Cunninghamb A. Prey selection and rejection by a microflagellate; implications for the study and operation of microbial food webs[J]. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 1996, 196(1): 357—372.

Hahn M W, Moore E R, Höfle M G. Bacterial filament formation, a defense mechanism against flagellate grazing, is growth rate controlled in bacteria of different phyla[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65(1): 25—35.

Matz C, Jürgens K. Effects of hydrophobic and electrostatic cell surface properties of bacteria on feeding rates of heterotrophic nanoflagellates[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2001, 67(2): 814—820.

Matz C, Deines P, Boenigk J, et al. Impact of violacein-producing bacteria on survival and feeding of bacterivorous nanoflagellates[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004, 70(3): 1593—1599.

Deines P, Matz C, Jürgens K. Toxicity of violacein-producing bacteria fed to bacterivorous freshwater plankton[J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 2009, 54(4): 1343—1352.

Boenigk J, Stadler P, Wiedlroither A, et al. Strain-specific differences in the grazing sensitivities of closely related ultramicrobacteria affiliated with the Polynucleobacter cluster[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004, 70(10): 5787—5793.

Roberts E C, Legrand C, Steinke M, et al. Mechanisms underlying chemical interactions between predatory planktonic protists and their prey[J]. J Plankton Res, 2011, 33(6): 833—841.

Boenigk J, Arndt H. Particle handling during interception feeding by four species of heterotrophic nanoflagellates[J]. J Eukaryot Microbiol, 2000, 47(4): 350—358.

Pfandl K, Posch T, Boenigk J. Unexpected effects of prey dimensions and morphologies on the size selective feeding by two bacterivorous flagellates (Ochromonas sp. and Spumella sp.)[J]. J Eukaryot Microbiol, 2004, 51(6): 626—633.

Wootton E C, Zubkov M V, Jones D H, et al. Biochemical prey recognition by planktonic protozoa[J]. Environ Microbiol, 2007, 9(1): 216—222.

González J M, Iriberri J, Egea L, et al. Differential rates of digestion of bacteria by freshwater and marine phagotrophic protozoa[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1990, 56(6): 1851—1857.

Roberts E C, Wootton E C, Davidson K, et al. Feeding in the dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina: linking behaviour with mechanisms[J]. J Plankton Res, 2011, 33(4): 603—614.

Hartz A J, Sherr B F, Sherr E B. Using inhibitors to investigate the involvement of cell signaling in predation by marine phagotrophic protists[J]. J Eukaryot Microbiol, 2008, 55(1): 18—21.

Güde H. Grazing by protozoa as selection factor for activated sludge bacteria[J]. Microb Ecol, 1979, 5(3): 225—237.

Hahn M W, Höfle M G. Grazing pressure by a bacterivorous flagellate reverses the relative abundance of Comamonas acidovorans PX54 and Vibrio strain CB5 in chemostat cocultures[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64(5): 1910—1918.

Hahn M W, Höfle M G. Flagellate predation on a bacterial model community: interplay of size-selective grazing, specific bacterial cell size,and bacterial community composition[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65(11): 4863—4872.

Posch T, Šimek K, Vrba J, et al. Predator-induced chancres of bacterial size-structure and productivity studied on an experimental microbial community[J]. Aquat Microb Ecol, 1999, 18(3): 235—246.

Sherr B F, Sherr E B, Mcdaniel J. Effect of protistan grazing on the frequency of dividing cells in bacterioplankton assemblages[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1992, 58(8): 2381—2385.

Verhagen F J M, Laanbroek H J. Effects of grazing by flagellates on competition for ammonium between nitrifying and heterotrophic bacteria in chemostats[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1992, 58(6): 1962—1969.

Šimek K, Macek M, Seda J, et al. Possible food chain relationships between bacterioplankton, protozoans, and cladocerans in a reservoir[J]. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 1990, 75(5): 583—596.

Del Giorgio P A, Gasol J M, Vaqué D, et al. Bacterioplankton community structure: protists control net production and the proportion of active bacteria in a coastal marine community[J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 1996, 41(6): 1169—1179.

González J M, Sherr E B, Sherr B F. Size-selective grazing on bacteria by natural assemblages of estuarine flagellates and ciliates[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1990, 56(3): 583—589.

Jürgens K, Güde H. The potential importance of grazing-resistant bacteria in planktonic systems[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1994, 112: 169—188.

Jürgens K, Pernthaler J, Schalla S, et al. Morphological and compositional changes in a planktonic bacterial community in response to enhanced protozoan grazing[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1999, 65(3): 1241—1250.

Šimek K, Kojeck P, Nedoma J, et al. Shifts in bacterial community composition associated with different microzooplankton size fractions in a eutrophic reservoir[J]. Limnol Oceanogr, 1999, 44(7): 1634—1644.

Van Hannen E J, Veninga M, Jaap B, et al. Genetic changes in the bacterial community structure associated with protistan grazers[J]. Arch Hydrobiol, 1999, 145(1): 25—38.

Šimek K, Vrba J, Pernthaler J, et al. Morphological and compositional shifts in an experimental bacterial community influenced by protists with contrasting feeding modes[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63(2): 587—595.

Pernthaler J, Posch T, Šimek K, et al. Contrasting bacterial strategies to coexist with a flagellate predator in an experimental microbial assemblage[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997, 63(2): 596—601.

Pernthaler J, Posch T, Šimek K, et al. Predator-specific enrichment of actinobacteria from a cosmopolitan freshwater clade in mixed continuous culture[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2001, 67(5): 2145—2155.

Guillou L, Jacquet S, Chr Tiennot-Dinet M-J, et al. Grazing impact of two small heterotrophic flagellates on Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus[J]. Aquat Microb Ecol, 2001, 26(2): 201—207.

Patterson D J, Larsen J. The biology of free-living heterotrophic flagellates[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

Pernthaler J. Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its ecological implications[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2005, 3(7): 537-546.

Christaki U, Courties C, Karayanni H, et al. Dynamic characteristics of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus consumption by bacterivorous nanoflagellates[J]. Microb Ecol, 2002, 43(3): 341—352.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计